Hmmm. While not taking any sides in the "conversation", quick note Donald..... I do think your (apparent) assumption that evidence from govt. literature and laboratory studies or field studies/metastudies trumps a career in a relevant industry comes across as a bit sweeping.
Yes, you can perhaps never be beaten in an argument by quoting official info. when there is no data to the contrary, but applying this kind of general data (Go ahead, look for something more specific

) to specific examples is effectively a kind of reductio ad absurdum. An experienced ground level practitioner will often, frankly, have a better assessment of risk of any given situation. Admittedly, given the gestation of Asbestos related conditions this is difficult to prove in this case, but I think you might agree that this is the case in many situations?
Or were you only talking in general? (Genuine question!)
Just a thought.
PS - What's so unsafe about your penis? (On second thoughts don't answer that

)
OK, I'm out.
