Page 1 of 1

adam savage

Posted: Sun Sep 15, 2013 7:57 am
by LudeIOW
so did anyone watch the programme about how to live for ever with adam savage last night ?

i liked the consept and the info tthey were putting across but dont think it was done in the best way :?

Posted: Sun Sep 15, 2013 9:42 am
by lewd lude lover
saw it last time round. I always like the science but personally its always quite a few steps behind what I am able to cope with and presented in such a sacharine sugar coated way as to make me feel slightly ill. Anyone watched what the bleep do we know? Prime example.

Discovery channel needs to understand we have all watched all the programs in level 1 and are ready for level 3.

I like adam savage because he is unashamedly exited by science and is a red personality to the core
(google search red,blue,green,yellow personality types) but he can get a little too much if not balanced by the Pure green of jamie Hinyman.

Posted: Sun Sep 15, 2013 10:51 am
by LudeIOW
o i agree i love a bit of science and adam savage has the ability to deliver it in a very genuine and captivating way, it was more the lay out of the programme that i couldnt quite get on with, the whole "back in 2182..." bit - but none the less still very interesting.

and i completely agree, i mean im no boffin but i did listen at school :lol: and i think it would be nice to see them kick it up a gear an get a bit deeper into it.

Posted: Sun Sep 15, 2013 12:27 pm
by lewd lude lover
yes. how many times can they trot out the twin slit experiment? We know already. partical and wave. get the funk on with it. :lol:

I think adam had quite a bit to do with the structure if you ask me. all over the place and a bit unfocused :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

Posted: Sun Sep 15, 2013 12:37 pm
by LudeIOW
:lol: :lol: very true, i think had it been a bit more "this is the reseach and these are the possibilities in the future" and not waffled about the bike accident he never had or the apocolypes that hasn`t happened they would of had time to go more indepth with it and it could of been alot more interesting, i understand people dont wanna feel like they are sat in a classroom while at home watching tv and thay have to "jazz it up a bit" but i think it could of been done better.

Posted: Sun Sep 15, 2013 8:33 pm
by lewd lude lover
they just need DISCOVERY and DISCOVERY +IQ. Two channels, sorted.

Posted: Sun Sep 15, 2013 9:16 pm
by Donald
:lol: Too true. 'Science' is hot jobby at the moment, and it's dumbed down for the masses. Specifically anything space related or old tech becoming relevant.